- 1 Vitajte v Krčme
- 2 Abecední řazení
- 3 Using only UploadWizard for uploads
- 4 Media Viewer
- 5 Media Viewer is now live on this wiki
- 6 Letter petitioning WMF to reverse recent decisions
- 7 Process ideas for software development
- 8 Obrázky v heslech
- 9 Grants to improve your project
- 10 Meta RfCs on two new global groups
- 11 Global AbuseFilter
- 12 Project: Wiktionary meets Matica srpska
- 13 [Global proposal] m.Wikislovník.org: (všetci) Upravovať stránky (ktoré nie sú diskusné stránky)
- 14 Inspire Campaign: Improving diversity, improving content
- 15 SUL finalization update
- 16 Dan Polansky
- 17 Stewards confirmation rules
- 18 Příklad
- 19 Nominations are being accepted for 2015 Wikimedia Foundation elections
- 20 Wikimedia Foundation Funds Dissemination Committee elections 2015
- 21 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees elections 2015
Vitajte v Krčme[upraviť]
Táto stránka sa používa na diskusie o technických otázkach, politike, novinkách a pripravovaných zmenách na Wikislovníku. Otvorte diskusiu o probléme, ktorý Vás trápi. Podpíšte sa menom a dátumom (použite ~~~~ alebo kliknite na symbol podpisu v paneli nástrojov počas úpravy).
Jelikož zde působí stejně jen česky mluvící ;-) odkážu na podrobnosti na Wikislovník. Chceme, aby zde fungovalo přirozené řazení dle abecedy? (ABCČD...ZŽ) namísto stávajícího (ABCD...ZČŠ...)? JAn Dudík (diskusia) 20:35, 8. máj 2014 (UTC)
- Pro. JAn Dudík (diskusia) 20:35, 8. máj 2014 (UTC)
- (Dočasně) Proti. Ze stejných důvodů jako na českých projektech.
— Danny B. 21:23, 21. máj 2014 (UTC)
- Asi také spíše proti. Na české wikipedii se to hodí, neboť české encyklopedie řadí podle české abecedy (tedy Churchill pod CH). Ale zde na slovníku máme různé jazyky, které řadí různě a bylo by např. nevhodné, aby se anglické cheap řadilo pod české CH. A to nemluvím o jazycích nepoužívajících latinku, jak by se změna dotkla jich. (Dotkla by se vůbec?) --Silesianus (diskusia) 11:27, 22. máj 2014 (UTC)
Using only UploadWizard for uploads[upraviť]
Hello! It was noted that on this wiki you have less than 10 local files. Presumably, you therefore don't have interest nor energies to have hundreds templates with the now required HTML, even less a local EDP. However, this means that users here will experience a mostly broken and/or illegal uploading. I propose to
- have local upload restricted to the "Správcovia" group (for emergency uploads) and
- the sidebar point to commons:Special:UploadWizard,
so that you can avoid local maintenance and all users can have a functioning, easy upload interface in their own language. All registered users can upload on Commons and existing files will not be affected.
I'll get this done in one week from now.
- If you disagree with the proposal, just remove your wiki from the list.
- To make the UploadWizard even better, please tell your experience and ideas on commons:Commons:Upload Wizard feedback.
Nemo 20:38, 19. máj 2014 (UTC)
Greetings, my apologies for writing in English.
I wanted to let you know that Media Viewer will be released to this wiki in the coming weeks. Media Viewer allows readers of Wikimedia projects to have an enhanced view of files without having to visit the file page, but with more detail than a thumbnail. You can try Media Viewer out now by turning it on in your Beta Features. If you do not enjoy Media Viewer or if it interferes with your work after it is turned on you will be able to disable Media Viewer as well in your preferences. I invite you to share what you think about Media Viewer and how it can be made better in the future.
Thank you for your time. - Keegan (WMF) 21:29, 23. máj 2014 (UTC)
Media Viewer is now live on this wiki[upraviť]
Greetings— and sorry for writing in English, please translate if it will help your community,
Media Viewer displays images in larger size when you click on their thumbnails, to provide a better viewing experience. Users can now view images faster and more clearly, without having to jump to separate pages — and its user interface is more intuitive, offering easy access to full-resolution images and information, with links to the file repository for editing. The tool has been tested extensively across all Wikimedia wikis over the past six months as a Beta Feature and has been released to the largest Wikipedias, all language Wikisources, and the English Wikivoyage already.
If you do not like this feature, you can easily turn it off by clicking on "Disable Media Viewer" at the bottom of the screen, pulling up the information panel (or in your your preferences) whether you have an account or not. Learn more in this Media Viewer Help page.
Please let us know if you have any questions or comments about Media Viewer. You are invited to share your feedback in this discussion on MediaWiki.org in any language, to help improve this feature. You are also welcome to take this quick survey in English, en français, o español.
Letter petitioning WMF to reverse recent decisions[upraviť]
The Wikimedia Foundation recently created a new feature, "superprotect" status. The purpose is to prevent pages from being edited by elected administrators -- but permitting WMF staff to edit them. It has been put to use in only one case: to protect the deployment of the Media Viewer software on German Wikipedia, in defiance of a clear decision of that community to disable the feature by default, unless users decide to enable it.
If you oppose these actions, please add your name to this letter. If you know non-Wikimedians who support our vision for the free sharing of knowledge, and would like to add their names to the list, please ask them to sign an identical version of the letter on change.org.
Process ideas for software development[upraviť]
’’My apologies for writing in English.’’
I am notifying you that a brainstorming session has been started on Meta to help the Wikimedia Foundation increase and better affect community participation in software development across all wiki projects. Basically, how can you be more involved in helping to create features on Wikimedia projects? We are inviting all interested users to voice their ideas on how communities can be more involved and informed in the product development process at the Wikimedia Foundation. It would be very appreciated if you could translate this message to help inform your local communities as well.
I and the rest of my team welcome you to participate. We hope to see you on Meta.
Obrázky v heslech[upraviť]
Bluepossum začal do zakládaných hesel přidávat obrázky. Otázka je, zda v nich obrázky chceme. Můj osobní názor je:
- v cizojazyčných heslech obrázky pouze v případě, že je obrázek opravdu nutný k pochopení významu. Pokud lze slovo jednoznačně přeložit do slovenštiny, je zde obrázek zbytečný.
- ve slovenských heslech už by obrázek nemusel tolik vadit, ale pouze tehdy, kdy zobrazuje předmět hesla, ne pouze ilustrační obrázek.
- Já bych obrázky vypustil úplně. --Silesianus (diskusia) 11:01, 27. august 2014 (UTC)
- Do slovníku obrázky nepatří. Odkazovat do Wikipedie a do Commons.
— Danny B. 21:39, 27. august 2014 (UTC)
Ja som začal pridavat obrázky lebo som ich videl pri inich jazykovych verziach. Obrazok pri slove by mal napomôct čitatelovi lahsie zapamätanie slova. Ono sa vari nejedna čo sa nam pači a čo nie ale čo Wiktionary povoluje.Bluepossum (diskusia) 05:11, 4. september 2014 (UTC) https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dogBluepossum (diskusia) 05:18, 4. september 2014 (UTC) vonkoncom by som nerobil rozdiely medzi cudzojazičnymi a slovenskymi heslami napriklad slovo ryba ma obrazok, bol by som zvedavy na cloveka krory si nevie predstavit rybu, dodavam ze mnohe jazykove verzie doplnaju zvukovu nahravku jednotlivych slov07:49, 4. september 2014 (UTC)
- I oppose wholesale removal of images from the Slovak Wiktionary. I should not really be voting here given my nonexistent contribution to the Slovak Wiktionary (my contribution to the English Wiktionary is non-trivial), but since the above-voting User:Danny B. does not contribute any lexicography either (not here, and not anywhere else), nor does the above-voting User:JAn Dudík contribute any lexicography here, my vote stays. I consider this discussion thread damned rude in itself; how can two users who contribute zero content propose to remove content wholesale, content plentifully present in the English, German and multiple other Wiktionaries, is beyond my understanding. Incredible. I apologize for posting in English; I do so to make the discussion easy to follow for a variety of admins who do not speak Czech or Slovak. --Dan Polansky (diskusia) 09:04, 6. apríl 2015 (UTC)
- Místo omluvy by bylo lepší doplnit slovenský (a nebo český) překlad.--Tchoř (diskusia) 13:26, 6. apríl 2015 (UTC)
- (cenzurováno)--Tchoř (diskusia) 16:24, 6. apríl 2015 (UTC)--Dan Polansky (diskusia) 13:30, 6. apríl 2015 (UTC)
- Váš příspěvek jsem vymazal (kdo chce, najde si ho v historii stránky). Domnívám se, že diskuse na projektech Wikimedia nemají sloužit k nepodloženým pomluvám a urážkám, ale hlavně zcela rozhodně nemají sloužit k nějaké umělé tvorbě mocenských klik ve stylu „my naštvaní na Tchoře“.--Tchoř (diskusia) 16:24, 6. apríl 2015 (UTC)
- (cenzurováno)--Tchoř (diskusia) 16:24, 6. apríl 2015 (UTC)--Dan Polansky (diskusia) 13:30, 6. apríl 2015 (UTC)
- Místo omluvy by bylo lepší doplnit slovenský (a nebo český) překlad.--Tchoř (diskusia) 13:26, 6. apríl 2015 (UTC)
- 5413 hesel
- 266, tj. 4,9 % s obrázkem
- z toho minimálně 202 s obrázkem nedávno přidaným uživatelem Bluepossum, tj. maximálně 1,2 % hesel s obrázky před tím
— Danny B. 15:03, 6. apríl 2015 (UTC)
- That does not matter. Bluepossum is a real contributor, of real content, unlike Danny B. Bluepossum must prevail. --Dan Polansky (diskusia) 16:50, 6. apríl 2015 (UTC)
Grants to improve your project[upraviť]
- Apologies for English. Please help translate this message.
Greetings! The Individual Engagement Grants program is accepting proposals for funding new experiments from September 1st to 30th. Your idea could improve Wikimedia projects with a new tool or gadget, a better process to support community-building on your wiki, research on an important issue, or something else we haven't thought of yet. Whether you need $200 or $30,000 USD, Individual Engagement Grants can cover your own project development time in addition to hiring others to help you.
- Submit your proposal
- Get help: In IdeaLab or an upcoming Hangout session MediaWiki message delivery (diskusia) 16:52, 2. september 2014 (UTC)
Meta RfCs on two new global groups[upraviť]
There are currently requests for comment open on meta to create two new global groups. The first is a group for members of the OTRS permissions queue, which would grant them autopatrolled rights on all wikis except those who opt-out. That proposal can be found at m:Requests for comment/Creation of a global OTRS-permissions user group. The second is a group for Wikimedia Commons admins and OTRS agents to view deleted file pages through the 'viewdeletedfile' right on all wikis except those who opt-out. The second proposal can be found at m:Requests for comment/Global file deletion review.
We would like to hear what you think on both proposals. Both are in English; if you wanted to translate them into your native language that would also be appreciated.
It is possible for individual projects to opt-out, so that users in those groups do not have any additional rights on those projects. To do this please start a local discussion, and if there is consensus you can request to opt-out of either or both at m:Stewards' noticeboard.Thanks and regards, Ajraddatz (talk) 18:04, 26. október 2014 (UTC)
AbuseFilter is a MediaWiki extension used to detect likely abusive behavior patterns, like pattern vandalism and spam. In 2013, Global AbuseFilters were enabled on a limited set of wikis including Meta-Wiki, MediaWiki.org, Wikispecies and (in early 2014) all the "small wikis". Recently, global abuse filters were enabled on "medium sized wikis" as well. These filters are currently managed by stewards on Meta-Wiki and have shown to be very effective in preventing mass spam attacks across Wikimedia projects. However, there is currently no policy on how the global AbuseFilters will be managed although there are proposals. There is an ongoing request for comment on policy governing the use of the global AbuseFilters. In the meantime, specific wikis can opt out of using the global AbuseFilter. These wikis can simply add a request to this list on Meta-Wiki. More details can be found on this page at Meta-Wiki. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on m:Talk:Global AbuseFilter.
— 17:36, 14. november 2014 (UTC)
Project: Wiktionary meets Matica srpska[upraviť]
We would like to inform you about the project. This project aims to increase support for Open Knowledge / Free Content movement through establishing long term strategic partnership with venerable cultural institution Matica srpska and increase the quality, accuracy and volume of Wiktionaries through digitization of two dictionaries while developing potential model for future development of cooperation across Wiktionaries through targeted mobilization of the communities.
There are two activities within the project that we need your support for. We are preparing the list of lexicography terms (it would contain approximately 100 terms) that needs to be translated into as many languages as possible in order to ensure further work on the project and create foundations for other lexicographical projects in the future. For this task, we would use a separate application, but all of the terms would be inserted into Wiktionaries, as well (making approximately 10,000 new entries per Wiktionary, counting that the terminology would be translated into 100 languages). That would also be the preparatory activity for translation of Ornithological dictionary.
Serbian ornithological dictionary encompasses all local names of birds living on the Serbian speaking territory. All names are specified under appropriate Latin name in accordance with contemporary classification system. This gives the opportunity to translate it easily to various languages, since the basic list of terms is in Latin and it is fairly small (370 species of birds).
We would like to try and motivate as much Wiktionary communities as possible to participate in translation of these two dictionaries, especially since the benefit for each particular Wiktionary would be great - for example, if we succeed to motivate people from 100 Wiktionaries to participate, the amount of primary entries to these 100 Wiktionaries would be 3,700,000 (37,000 per Wiktionary). If we succeed to motivate just 20 Wiktionaries, the amount of entries to these 20 Wikitionaries would be 148,000 basic entries. Of course, these entries would be incorporated to respective Wiktionaries according to the interest and the rules of each community.
With this project we are opening cooperation with venerable Serbian cultural institution Matica srpska and we believe that this partnership will have major impact on future cooperation between Wikimedia organizations and similar institutions in Slavic countries. Matica slovenská and Matica srpska have long history of active cooperation, including the fact that Pavol Jozef Šafárik was one of the co-founders of Matica srpska. We believe that our cooperation with Matica srpska could be used as a model in establishing similar partnership between your community and Matica slovenská, and we are willing to share our knowledge and contacts to achieve that.
Besides support in translation, we are open for Wikimedia volunteers to participate more substantially and thus build knowledge inside of the community on how to deal with this kind of data. For example, if you are willing to join the core team and help us in communication with the Wiktionary communities of the languages which you are speaking, please contact Milica (email@example.com) or Milos (firstname.lastname@example.org) via email. The same goes if you are willing to contribute by coding in Python and/or PHP.
Please join us on project's discussion page or send us an e-mail. If you are willing to participate but are not sure in your knowledge of English please check the list of languages organizational team is speaking - there is a chance we can communicate in your native language.
We are very excited about this projects and hope that you will be part of it as well!
Looking forward to hear from you!
[Global proposal] m.Wikislovník.org: (všetci) Upravovať stránky (ktoré nie sú diskusné stránky)[upraviť]
Hi, this message is to let you know that, on domains like sk.m.wikipedia.org, unregistered users cannot edit. At the Wikimedia Forum, where global configuration changes are normally discussed, a few dozens users propose to restore normal editing permissions on all mobile sites. Please read and comment!
Thanks and sorry for writing in English, Nemo 22:33, 1. marec 2015 (UTC)
Inspire Campaign: Improving diversity, improving content[upraviť]
This March, we’re organizing an Inspire Campaign to encourage and support new ideas for improving gender diversity on Wikimedia projects. Less than 20% of Wikimedia contributors are women, and many important topics are still missing in our content. We invite all Wikimedians to participate. If you have an idea that could help address this problem, please get involved today! The campaign runs until March 31.
All proposals are welcome - research projects, technical solutions, community organizing and outreach initiatives, or something completely new! Funding is available from the Wikimedia Foundation for projects that need financial support. Constructive, positive feedback on ideas is appreciated, and collaboration is encouraged - your skills and experience may help bring someone else’s project to life. Join us at the Inspire Campaign and help this project better represent the world’s knowledge!
SUL finalization update[upraviť]
Hi all,apologies for writing in English, please read this page for important information and an update involving SUL finalization, scheduled to take place in one month. Thanks. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:46, 13. marec 2015 (UTC)
Prosím správce o zásah proti Danu Polanskému. Trvá na tom, že mne zde bude nepravdivě očerňovat a zakládat proti mně nějakou mocenskou kliku. Domnívám se, že takový postup je proti duchu spolupráce na projektech Wikimedia. --Tchoř (diskusia) 17:16, 6. apríl 2015 (UTC)
Stewards confirmation rules[upraviť]
Hello, I made a proposal on Meta to change the rules for the steward confirmations. Currently consensus to remove is required for a steward to lose his status, however I think it's fairer to the community if every steward needed the consensus to keep. As this is an issue that affects all WMF wikis, I'm sending this notification to let people know & be able to participate. Best regards, --MF-W 16:12, 10. apríl 2015 (UTC)
- Není, mám zkusit zkopírovat z cs?--Zdenekk2 (diskusia) 19:25, 11. apríl 2015 (UTC)
- Nijak, takže případně šablony by se také musely zkopírovat z cs.--Zdenekk2 (diskusia) 11:27, 12. apríl 2015 (UTC)
V týdnu se na to zkusím podívat, každopádně by bylo vhodné tu nadefinovat nějaké mantinely, aby se neopakovala známá historie...
— Danny B. 20:30, 12. apríl 2015 (UTC)
I am pleased to announce that nominations are now being accepted for the 2015 Wikimedia Foundation Elections. This year the Board and the FDC Staff are looking for a diverse set of candidates from regions and projects that are traditionally under-represented on the board and in the movement as well as candidates with experience in technology, product or finance. To this end they have published letters describing what they think is needed and, recognizing that those who know the community the best are the community themselves, the election committee is accepting nominations for community members you think should run and will reach out to those nominated to provide them with information about the job and the election process.
This year, elections are being held for the following roles:
Board of Trustees
The Board of Trustees is the decision-making body that is ultimately responsible for the long term sustainability of the Foundation, so we value wide input into its selection. There are three positions being filled. More information about this role can be found at the board elections page.
Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC)
The Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) makes recommendations about how to allocate Wikimedia movement funds to eligible entities. There are five positions being filled. More information about this role can be found at the FDC elections page.
Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) Ombud
The FDC Ombud receives complaints and feedback about the FDC process, investigates complaints at the request of the Board of Trustees, and summarizes the investigations and feedback for the Board of Trustees on an annual basis. One position is being filled. More information about this role can be found at the FDC Ombudsperson elections page.
The candidacy submission phase lasts from 00:00 UTC April 20 to 23:59 UTC May 5 for the Board and from 00:00 UTCApril 20 to 23:59 UTC April 30 for the FDC and FDC Ombudsperson. This year, we are accepting both self-nominations and nominations of others. More information on this election and the nomination process can be found on the 2015 Wikimedia elections page on Meta-Wiki.
Please feel free to post a note about the election on your project's village pump. Any questions related to the election can be posted on the talk page on Meta, or sent to the election committee's mailing list, board-elections -at- wikimedia.org
Voting has begun for eligible voters in the 2015 elections for the Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) and FDC Ombudsperson. Questions and discussion with the candidates for the Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) and FDC Ombudsperson will continue during the voting. Nominations for the Board of Trustees will be accepted until 23:59 UTC May 5.
The Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) makes recommendations about how to allocate Wikimedia movement funds to eligible entities. There are five positions on the committee being filled.
The FDC Ombudsperson receives complaints and feedback about the FDC process, investigates complaints at the request of the Board of Trustees, and summarizes the investigations and feedback for the Board of Trustees on an annual basis. One position is being filled.
The voting phase lasts from 00:00 UTC May 3 to 23:59 UTC May 10. Click here to vote. Questions and discussion with the candidates will continue during that time. Click here to ask the FDC candidates a question. Click here to ask the FDC Ombudsperson candidates a question. More information on the candidates and the elections can be found on the 2015 FDC election page, the 2015 FDC Ombudsperson election page, and the 2015 Board election page on Meta-Wiki.
The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees is the ultimate governing authority of the Wikimedia Foundation, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization registered in the United States. The Wikimedia Foundation manages many diverse projects such as Wikipedia and Commons.